Brand Names And Trademarks Simplified: Part One

by Paul Ruden
Brand Names And Trademarks Simplified: Part One

Photo: Nick Youngson


In a recent reader poll by Travel Market Report, the subject of branding and trademark/name protection was ranked high in interest by many readers. And indeed, it’s a complex subject involving common law, state law and federal law. I will discuss the broad elements of the governing rules in a series of articles, beginning here with an introduction to protecting brand names in the service industry we call “travel retailing.” 

Brand names are valuable because they help consumers identify the source of particular services and ease their finding (or returning to) service providers that have developed reputations as providers of good experiences. They also reduce the potential for bad actors to prey on the good names of successful firms by appearing to be that firm when they are not.

Common sense then tells us that in order to serve the function of accurately identifying the source of services, the brand name of the business must have qualities of uniqueness so that it separates one firm from all others in the mind of the consumer. This is the purpose and essence of branding. 

Name protection for products is obtained through trademarks; a “service mark” is simply a trademark for a service rather than a physical “good.” The law of trademarks is designed to protect the owner of such names from copycats and to give the advantage to the first user of what becomes a commercially attractive brand name.

Service mark protection thus attaches only to marks that are sufficiently distinctive that they identify the source of the particular service. Distinctiveness runs along a spectrum from marks that are generic, descriptive, suggestive and, finally, arbitrary/fanciful.   

Generic marks are not protected at all because they simply describe the underlying service in ways that cannot distinguish one provider from another. Thus, terms such as “travel agency” or “tour operator” are plainly generic. Such names, by themselves, will not confer any right to exclusive use by one firm as against the others in the same business.  

Descriptive marks identify the service in question but are not, by themselves, sufficiently distinctive to secure service mark protection unless they have acquired, and you have evidence showing, “secondary meaning.” Secondary meaning is a term of legal art that means the public associates the mark with a single firm rather than the service itself. Secondary meaning is not a particularly reliable method of securing trademark protection because it generally requires a showing of long-term use in commerce and significant publicity/advertising/other exposure to many consumers. If secondary meaning is never established, the brand, tradename or mark, though near and dear to the heart of the user and important to its business, may be vulnerable to use by other firms. And without secondary meaning, a descriptive mark cannot be registered with the federal Patent and Trademark Office.  

“Sharp” is an example of a descriptive product mark that has secondary meaning for production of television sets. One common misconception is that adding a proper name to an otherwise generic mark can achieve trademark protection. “Smith Travel” is an example of a non-protectable service mark unless the user can establish secondary meaning. Doing that with a common name is very difficult. 

The third category of marks, that get a high degree of trademark protection, are?suggestive marks. These imply a characteristic of the underlying service but do not specifically describe the service.? Coppertone is a typically used example of a suggestive trademark that suggests sun-tan lotion without actually describing the product. A mental leap of sorts is necessary to connect the trademark to the product.  

The final category is fanciful/arbitrary marks. Fanciful names are invented for use as a service mark to identify certain services with a particular firm. They do not describe anything in the real world (think “Trivago” or “AMEX”). An arbitrary name is a term with a common meaning or usage, but that has no connection to the service to which it is attached (think “Apple” for computers). The sole purpose of such names is branding, and they receive the strongest trademark protection because they most powerfully connect the brand name with the provider. These names refer to the producer of the types of services described in the service mark registration. It is thus common that a fanciful name may be used by different firms in completely different industries where such usage will not result in confusion for consumers as to what firm the name identifies.  

You now know the types of service marks and generally the extent to which trademark protection is available for them. In the next installment, I will discuss how full protection can be secured and also how protection can be lost.

  0
  0
Tip of the Day
Daily Top List

Most Useful Twitter Accounts for Travel Agents

1. AskTSA

2. FlightRadar24

3. Department of State

4. CLIA Global

5. ASTA

Source: TMR

TMR THIS WEEK
http://services.travelsavers.com/AMGService.svc/REST/GetImage?ImageID=01926fc8-d3f7-e711-80eb-782bcb667b27

Look to Luxury Land Clients When Filling Luxury Cruise Ships

Capturing the ‘not-so-new’ luxury travelers and converting them to luxury cruise passengers can lead to big business for travel agents.

TMR Recommendations
Top Stories
Bomb Cyclone Delay Raises Issue of Clients' Rights When Service Goes Awry
Bomb Cyclone Delay Raises Issue of Clients' Rights When Service Goes Awry

An airport incident between passengers and a Canadian airline in Boston during the “bomb cyclone” highlights the tensions that can rise when there are significant delays.

Multi-Trip Travel Insurance Could Cost Less, But Has Low Awareness
Multi-Trip Travel Insurance Could Cost Less, But Has Low Awareness

This lesser known option has yet to catch on because most travelers aren’t aware of it, and agents are more inclined to sell single-trip policies.

What Do the New Facebook Rules Mean for Travel Agents?
What Do the New Facebook Rules Mean for Travel Agents?

Changes announced this week by Facebook’s CEO may lead to less value for businesses trying to reach customers through unpaid content on the social media platform.

Lonely Planet’s Top Places for Solo Travel Includes Adventure and Foodie Destinations
Lonely Planet’s Top Places for Solo Travel Includes Adventure and Foodie Destinations

The travel guide’s list includes 10 cities from around the world that will convince even the most uneasy single traveler that it’s time to start exploring solo.

Headquarters Happenings: After a Successful 2017, Travel Leaders Looks to a Stronger 2018
Headquarters Happenings: After a Successful 2017, Travel Leaders Looks to a Stronger 2018

Synergies from 2017 merger, enhanced travel agent tools, and expanded luxury offerings propel the company into the new year.

Travel Agents Sail into Wave Season
Travel Agents Sail into Wave Season

Travel professionals are taking new approaches to their customers, their marketing and their business processes in 2018.

News Briefs
Advertiser's Voice
Advertiser's Voice: Scenic Cruises